This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedy delete. —Korath (Talk) 00:35, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
Or both. Delete. --Briangotts 01:48, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete: I don't think she really wants the sorts of contacts she'd get from a listing on Wikipedia when we get slashdotted. It seems like an ad for a non-profit. Pure of heart or weak of mind, the material is inappropriate. Homeless folks only in Williamsburg, Virginia need apply, and the numbers of them with computer access who will look at Wikipedia when thinking of their housing needs must be very small indeed. Geogre 05:54, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete. She really doesn't know what she's doing by posting this here. It's not an encyclopedic article anyway. RickK 06:10, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, article as it stands is not encyclopaedic, promo. Megan1967 07:05, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Localised advert, not encyclopedic. Average Earthman 08:21, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Though the author is well intended, this is simply not encyclopedic. -Casito 08:56, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.